While reading Maus, we repeatedly
noted that Art Spiegelman wants to show how connected the past and the present
really are. He does this through details in the illustrations and text with
hidden meanings that we analyzed in class. As a society, we tend to think that
the past is, well, the past. That it already happened, and that all those
people were dead anyways, so who cares? Although it makes sense to think this
way, Art Spiegelman thinks of the past differently, and I think that is one of
the main arguments that he supports. After all, the past was once the present.
It is important to realize that the past influences the
present more than we give it credit for. During a present scene in Maus, Vladek
openly discriminates against a black hitchhiker by checking his groceries and
calling the man a “shvartser”. Ironically, Vladek was a victim in the Holocaust
because of discrimination, but that hardly had an impact on his suspicion of African
Americans. In fact, Vladek’s racial views in the present were most likely enhanced
because of his experience in the Holocaust, where people were against one
another and trust was rare. But, even if the past impacts the present, I still
think that the two are separate. In my opinion, the effects of past events
trickle into the present, but the two will never formerly collide. Which is a good thing, because I doubt many
people wish the Holocaust or a world war was happening right now.
Hi Yasmeen! I really enjoyed reading your blog. I also wrote about racism in the novel, and I still find it astounding that Vladek could be so racist. I like how you tied Vladek's racism with our class discussion about the past vs present.
ReplyDelete